This is a quick update to my earlier post on open access journals.
You may have noticed that much of the action in open access publishing is in the STM (science, technology and medicine) areas–this is happening largely because of the crisis in STM publishing that has been going on for most of this decade. A useful article to read on the subject is “ Open Access and the STM Publishing Crisis: A Medical Librarian’s View” by Elizabeth D’Antonio-Gan, which was published in The Charleston Adviser 5(3) p. 56, Jan. 2004 (access limited to SC users). It’s a good snapshot of the problems facing libraries and institutions regarding STM journals, and the pressures which are driving the growth of open access.
One resource I found by reading this article is the Public Library of Science or PLoS, which publishes such open access journals as PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine and PLoS Genetics.
The most interesting journal I found on the site, however, was PLoS One, which describes itself as “A new way of communicating peer-reviewed science and medicine.” PLoS One includes articles from all scientific disciplines (see the list of subjects here), which the editors believe facilitates contact and connection across different fields. It’s also a high-volume publication, and publishes articles essentially as often as they can. There are no set volumes or issues, so research is transmitted as quickly as is possible (PLoS One does have an editorial and peer review process, so journal articles aren’t published instantaneously). For example, I took a look at articles published within the last week, and found 31. A good number of them were published yesterday. Unfortunately, PLoS One and other PLoS journals do seem to charge high publication fees. This is the price of open access–costs are offloaded onto the authors!
Another interesting feature of PLoS One is the ability to annotate and rate articles. Any registered user has the ability to add annotations and to give a rating to any article in the journal. Registration is free and easy–I completed the process in under five minutes. This rating and annotation system is currently in beta–but may expand to other PLoS journals in the future.
The Public Library of Science is trying to create an online academic community around their journals, which is an admirable goal. I’m going to watch this site closely to see what other new and interesting ideas pop up here.
All seven of the PLoS journals are indexed in MEDLINE.
